<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tivo should license their tech to the web space</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelkimsal.com/blog/tivo-should-license-their-tech-to-the-web-space/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelkimsal.com/blog/tivo-should-license-their-tech-to-the-web-space/</link>
	<description>Web development and new media observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:02:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DVR functionality on the web? &#124; Michael Kimsal's weblog</title>
		<link>http://michaelkimsal.com/blog/tivo-should-license-their-tech-to-the-web-space/comment-page-1/#comment-68661</link>
		<dc:creator>DVR functionality on the web? &#124; Michael Kimsal's weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkimsal.com/blog/?p=640#comment-68661</guid>
		<description>[...] in their player. Good to see it, and I just felt like posting that I did call this out as a need last fall :)  It&#8217;s not quite what I was hoping for just yet, but it sounds like they&#8217;re moving [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in their player. Good to see it, and I just felt like posting that I did call this out as a need last fall <img src='http://michaelkimsal.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   It&#8217;s not quite what I was hoping for just yet, but it sounds like they&#8217;re moving [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MPS</title>
		<link>http://michaelkimsal.com/blog/tivo-should-license-their-tech-to-the-web-space/comment-page-1/#comment-52649</link>
		<dc:creator>MPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkimsal.com/blog/?p=640#comment-52649</guid>
		<description>Yeah, no doubt it&#039;s possible to do this, and I agree it&#039;s odd they haven&#039;t done it already. Perhaps there are DRM concerns at play here? Who knows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, no doubt it&#8217;s possible to do this, and I agree it&#8217;s odd they haven&#8217;t done it already. Perhaps there are DRM concerns at play here? Who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mgkimsal</title>
		<link>http://michaelkimsal.com/blog/tivo-should-license-their-tech-to-the-web-space/comment-page-1/#comment-52641</link>
		<dc:creator>mgkimsal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkimsal.com/blog/?p=640#comment-52641</guid>
		<description>http://news.softpedia.com/news/Leaked-TiVo-Series3-Specs-Prices-and-Photo-Hit-the-Web-60180.shtml

All I could find on short notice, but a Tivo Series 3 (latest and greatest) has 128M of RAM.  That&#039;s it.  Yeah, some have larger hard drives, but these are current.  Our Tivos from a few year ago probably have something like a 80 gig drive, if that.  

The big diff arguably is that there&#039;s dedicated hardware decoders and a &#039;regular&#039; PC wouldn&#039;t have that.  The &#039;buffering&#039; feature in a Flash player, for example, could be something that&#039;s only enabled if the player determines the system has adequate speed and resources to do it, imo.

Booting up a Tivo takes a LONG time - usually 5-10 minutes, sometimes longer (just had to reboot the other day).  Things like Windows Media Center and MythTV are much much faster, and are dealing with full screen stuff.  I&#039;m just talking about the little youtube videos have a buffer/pause/rewind feature.  A &#039;skip back 10 seconds&#039; would be great too - trying to click back using the slider is awkward at best.  Well, we don&#039;t even have sliders to slide in &#039;live streaming video&#039; but if it was buffered, you&#039;d need that if you skipped back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/Leaked-TiVo-Series3-Specs-Prices-and-Photo-Hit-the-Web-60180.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://news.softpedia.com/news/Leaked-TiVo-Series3-Specs-Prices-and-Photo-Hit-the-Web-60180.shtml</a></p>
<p>All I could find on short notice, but a Tivo Series 3 (latest and greatest) has 128M of RAM.  That&#8217;s it.  Yeah, some have larger hard drives, but these are current.  Our Tivos from a few year ago probably have something like a 80 gig drive, if that.  </p>
<p>The big diff arguably is that there&#8217;s dedicated hardware decoders and a &#8216;regular&#8217; PC wouldn&#8217;t have that.  The &#8216;buffering&#8217; feature in a Flash player, for example, could be something that&#8217;s only enabled if the player determines the system has adequate speed and resources to do it, imo.</p>
<p>Booting up a Tivo takes a LONG time &#8211; usually 5-10 minutes, sometimes longer (just had to reboot the other day).  Things like Windows Media Center and MythTV are much much faster, and are dealing with full screen stuff.  I&#8217;m just talking about the little youtube videos have a buffer/pause/rewind feature.  A &#8217;skip back 10 seconds&#8217; would be great too &#8211; trying to click back using the slider is awkward at best.  Well, we don&#8217;t even have sliders to slide in &#8216;live streaming video&#8217; but if it was buffered, you&#8217;d need that if you skipped back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MPS</title>
		<link>http://michaelkimsal.com/blog/tivo-should-license-their-tech-to-the-web-space/comment-page-1/#comment-52640</link>
		<dc:creator>MPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkimsal.com/blog/?p=640#comment-52640</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know much about how streaming video  players are implemented but I&#039;d imagine this would consume a lot of memory (either RAM or disk) in order to store the video as it&#039;s being viewed. Set top boxes are optimized for this task while desktop computers are not.

Still, I agree some easy option for archiving some window of the video stream would be a nice feature. You can probably already &quot;hijack&quot; a video stream with some 3rd party app, similar to Audio Hijack for the Mac (which is AWESOME btw), but it should be built into the player itself, ideally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know much about how streaming video  players are implemented but I&#8217;d imagine this would consume a lot of memory (either RAM or disk) in order to store the video as it&#8217;s being viewed. Set top boxes are optimized for this task while desktop computers are not.</p>
<p>Still, I agree some easy option for archiving some window of the video stream would be a nice feature. You can probably already &#8220;hijack&#8221; a video stream with some 3rd party app, similar to Audio Hijack for the Mac (which is AWESOME btw), but it should be built into the player itself, ideally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
