Phone tree systems suck, and some ideas to fix them

Date November 22, 2007

I’ve had two frustrating phone calls with directv today which brought to the fore all the things I hate about dealing with phone services.  Every time I call up places that I regularly call, I’m forced to

1.  Press “dos” if I “desea espanol”.

2.  Tell the friendly attendant robot what my needs are, like “tell me about your specials” or “tell me how much money I owe you”.

3.  Enter in an account number or phone number

4.  Wait as a robotic voice reads it back to me

5.  Press or say “1″ or “yes” if correct, etc.

6.  Wait while I’m connected to the appropriate department

7.  Repeat my same account number to the person I was just transferred to

8.  Give other identifying info (last 4 of social, etc).

I had a car financed through Chrysler, and they had things a bit better.  Once you’d identified yourself, they associated your account number with your phone number, so when you called the second thing (after the ‘choose spanish’) was “we think you’re calling about account number xxxxx, is this correct?”  That saved 30-60 seconds off each call compared to other systems I normally have to deal with.

DirecTV, I *JUST* called you back from the same phone number I called from 4 minutes earlier.  Can you not keep my ‘preferences’ (english, account number, etc.) in your phone system and reroute me accordingly?

Also, I *HATE* the notion of ‘talking’ to the voice activated attendants.  To get a balance on my car loan, I just wanted to hit ‘4′ on the phone, or whatever I need to (like I used to with Chrysler) instead of now having to say outloud “payoff balance” or “late payment” or whatever the magic words are to get me the info I want.  I do not want people around me knowing what my needs are.  By forcing me to speak in English phrases, as Chrysler did by taking away the ‘press 4′-type options, I’m *forced* in to either calling back again (bad experience for me) or going to an operator (forcing them money) and taking longer on the phone (to find a semi-private place to do my business).  We do not all just sit in home offices with small piles of nice bills with fresh-baked bread in the background like in magazine and tv commercials spouting the conveniences of ‘online payments’.  I’d imagine there’s a few of us, like me, who  do these sorts of things from mobile phones at work or lunch or wherever.

Customer service departments, if you’re going to migrate to voice recognition technology, offer a separate line which just has numeric phone trees for people who know what they’re doing, sort of like express and/or automated checkouts at the grocery store.  I don’t *want* to talk to anyone (human or otherwise) - I just want to press 4 buttons and get my info.

Lastly, give people a short passphrase to type in which would identify me based on my phone number, and bring me back to where I want to go.  If I call my bank regularly from my cell phone, I should be able to call up from the cell, type in a 4-6 digit code, and just have my balances read to me, or whatever standard stuff I want.

 Did you like this post? Buy me a hot chocolate!

4 Responses to “Phone tree systems suck, and some ideas to fix them”

  1. Bill Robertson said:

    The passphrase idea is pure genius. I can’t imagine someone not running with that. Keep em comin’…

  2. MPS said:

    I completely agree. One of my pet peeves is entering in a bunch of data (account numbers, SS#, etc.), only to be asked for it all over again when finally reaching a human.

    One exception is Google’s new completely automated and free 411 service. I’ve recently had a few cases where Google’s service was able to find phone numbers that Sprint 411 couldn’t. I guess this demonstrates in part how poor Sprint’s 411 service is, but I have to admit Google’s speech recognition software is pretty good, as long as there’s no background noise.

    Another good example of an automated phone tree system is the traffic information service in the Bay Area (511). We have something similar here in the Triangle but it’s not quite as good. Check it out next time you visit!

  3. mgkimsal said:

    Is 511 free from a cell? I may give it a shot.

    I’m not suggesting voice will completely go away, but companies need to determine how and where their users will be interacting with the system. To force voice in all situations, even where the ‘input data’ can be translated to (or is natively) numeric values, is just dumb.

    @bill - perhaps that should be patented if it’s not already?

  4. bnicole said:

    There are better alternatives than phone trees. There are a number of companies that provide messaging services that deliver messages reliably and efficiently. For example, Freedom Message’s service will send a message out to an entire organization through email, text, or voice messaging. Simply type the message and select people from your organization you would like to receive it. Check it out at http://www.freedommessage.net.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <pre lang="" line="">